Comments on: Billboard Lobbyists Have More Rights Than Publicly Owned Trees Do. http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2008/09/15/billboard-lobbyists-have-more-rights-than-publicly-owned-trees-do/ Sustainability, Environment, Progressive Politics, Peak Oil, Going Green. Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:40:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Emily http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2008/09/15/billboard-lobbyists-have-more-rights-than-publicly-owned-trees-do/#comment-17037 Emily Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:50:30 +0000 http://www.thegoodhuman.com/?p=2024#comment-17037 This makes me so glad I live in Vermont where there are NO BILLBOARDS!! Just miles and miles of beautiful greenery as far as the eye can see. It's awesome! This makes me so glad I live in Vermont where there are NO BILLBOARDS!! Just miles and miles of beautiful greenery as far as the eye can see. It’s awesome!

]]> By: David http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2008/09/15/billboard-lobbyists-have-more-rights-than-publicly-owned-trees-do/#comment-17001 David Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:06:27 +0000 http://www.thegoodhuman.com/?p=2024#comment-17001 Now there is an idea Sharky, you should pitch it. ;-) Now there is an idea Sharky, you should pitch it. ;-)

]]> By: Sharky http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2008/09/15/billboard-lobbyists-have-more-rights-than-publicly-owned-trees-do/#comment-17000 Sharky Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:05:06 +0000 http://www.thegoodhuman.com/?p=2024#comment-17000 Makes you wonder why advertisers don't invent "sleeves" for tree trunks that they can print their messages on instead of cutting down trees to make room for wooden advertising hoardings. Not the perfect solution, admittedly, but at least it's a compromise. What's the betting that one of the advertisements displayed at the expense of trees will be for Greenpeace or Friends of the Earth? Stupid advertisers. Makes you wonder why advertisers don’t invent “sleeves” for tree trunks that they can print their messages on instead of cutting down trees to make room for wooden advertising hoardings. Not the perfect solution, admittedly, but at least it’s a compromise.

What’s the betting that one of the advertisements displayed at the expense of trees will be for Greenpeace or Friends of the Earth? Stupid advertisers.

]]>