<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clorox Doing Their Best To Greenwash Themselves.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2008/01/23/clorox-doing-their-best-to-greenwash-themselves/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2008/01/23/clorox-doing-their-best-to-greenwash-themselves/</link>
	<description>Sustainability, Environment, Progressive Politics, Peak Oil, Going Green.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:40:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2008/01/23/clorox-doing-their-best-to-greenwash-themselves/#comment-25491</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 05:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2008/01/23/clorox-doing-their-best-to-greenwash-themselves/#comment-25491</guid>
		<description>You should know I sympathize with the majority of your writing and acquiesce with the hardline and perspicacious stances you take. However, consider the nature of a chemical. A chemical is merely a physcial substance with a chemical composition: the air we breathe, for example. It is a weak point in the bulwark of your wording i thought i&#039;d point out - as a friend, of course.

cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should know I sympathize with the majority of your writing and acquiesce with the hardline and perspicacious stances you take. However, consider the nature of a chemical. A chemical is merely a physcial substance with a chemical composition: the air we breathe, for example. It is a weak point in the bulwark of your wording i thought i&#8217;d point out &#8211; as a friend, of course.</p>
<p>cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2008/01/23/clorox-doing-their-best-to-greenwash-themselves/#comment-21564</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2008/01/23/clorox-doing-their-best-to-greenwash-themselves/#comment-21564</guid>
		<description>They aren&#039;t - their product is not even truly natural.  There are great, natural products on the market one can buy. If Clorox really cared, they would have done 2 things:  

1. Made a truly natural product to sell.
2. Not paid the Sierra Club some amount of money to get a greenwashing label.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They aren&#8217;t &#8211; their product is not even truly natural.  There are great, natural products on the market one can buy. If Clorox really cared, they would have done 2 things:  </p>
<p>1. Made a truly natural product to sell.<br />
2. Not paid the Sierra Club some amount of money to get a greenwashing label.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mona</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2008/01/23/clorox-doing-their-best-to-greenwash-themselves/#comment-21563</link>
		<dc:creator>Mona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2008/01/23/clorox-doing-their-best-to-greenwash-themselves/#comment-21563</guid>
		<description>First of all, I&#039;m not defending Clorox in any way.

However, if you were CEO of Clorox and you wanted to stop making the harmful product, wouldn&#039;t you introduce something better and greener to replace the product?  You can&#039;t just STOP making your top product and expect to survive.  You have to pass the marketshare to a better product first.  Is it worth supporting so they can make that changeover to a better product?  I really don&#039;t know. How would you suggest they start making a change for the better?

Besides, if people weren&#039;t choosing bleach, there&#039;d be no reason to make it, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I&#8217;m not defending Clorox in any way.</p>
<p>However, if you were CEO of Clorox and you wanted to stop making the harmful product, wouldn&#8217;t you introduce something better and greener to replace the product?  You can&#8217;t just STOP making your top product and expect to survive.  You have to pass the marketshare to a better product first.  Is it worth supporting so they can make that changeover to a better product?  I really don&#8217;t know. How would you suggest they start making a change for the better?</p>
<p>Besides, if people weren&#8217;t choosing bleach, there&#8217;d be no reason to make it, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2008/01/23/clorox-doing-their-best-to-greenwash-themselves/#comment-15437</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 22:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2008/01/23/clorox-doing-their-best-to-greenwash-themselves/#comment-15437</guid>
		<description>ANCA - you cannot be green and still sell bleach, that&#039;s the problem with them!  Glad you like the site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ANCA &#8211; you cannot be green and still sell bleach, that&#8217;s the problem with them!  Glad you like the site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
