<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ten Ways To Convince A Non-Green That Going Green Saves Money.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2007/11/13/ten-ways-to-convince-a-non-green-that-going-green-saves-money/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2007/11/13/ten-ways-to-convince-a-non-green-that-going-green-saves-money/</link>
	<description>Sustainability, Environment, Progressive Politics, Peak Oil, Being Green.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:16:11 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: From The Good Human Archives - November 2007. &#124; The Good Human</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2007/11/13/ten-ways-to-convince-a-non-green-that-going-green-saves-money/comment-page-1/#comment-18018</link>
		<dc:creator>From The Good Human Archives - November 2007. &#124; The Good Human</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2007/11/13/ten-ways-to-convince-a-non-green-that-going-green-saves-money/#comment-18018</guid>
		<description>[...] Ten Ways To Convince A Non-Green That Going Green Saves Money. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ten Ways To Convince A Non-Green That Going Green Saves Money. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are you willing to save a little money? &#171; greener loudoun</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2007/11/13/ten-ways-to-convince-a-non-green-that-going-green-saves-money/comment-page-1/#comment-13178</link>
		<dc:creator>Are you willing to save a little money? &#171; greener loudoun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2007/11/13/ten-ways-to-convince-a-non-green-that-going-green-saves-money/#comment-13178</guid>
		<description>[...] to The Good Human.com, here&#8217;s ten things you can do to keep a little more discretionary income in your pocket (and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to The Good Human.com, here&#8217;s ten things you can do to keep a little more discretionary income in your pocket (and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Tipping</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2007/11/13/ten-ways-to-convince-a-non-green-that-going-green-saves-money/comment-page-1/#comment-7038</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Tipping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2007/11/13/ten-ways-to-convince-a-non-green-that-going-green-saves-money/#comment-7038</guid>
		<description>This is great stuff. Another &#039;attitudinal&#039; idea, I refer to here.

http://greenonthecommon.blogspot.com/2007/09/make-love-not-eco.html

There’s a lot of debate about whether fuel economy messages are right for green. Like any innovation, green innovations need to have a genuine utility and use that exist beyond ‘green’. 

The big Q is “what extent is the new product better than the one it is replacing?” The more better, the better. Which is why within a hierarchy of messages (I’m not suggesting that fuel economy should be higher up than green), it’s important to think about the other relative advantages of green innovations.Check out my blog for more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great stuff. Another &#8216;attitudinal&#8217; idea, I refer to here.</p>
<p><a href="http://greenonthecommon.blogspot.com/2007/09/make-love-not-eco.html" rel="nofollow">http://greenonthecommon.blogspot.com/2007/09/make-love-not-eco.html</a></p>
<p>There’s a lot of debate about whether fuel economy messages are right for green. Like any innovation, green innovations need to have a genuine utility and use that exist beyond ‘green’. </p>
<p>The big Q is “what extent is the new product better than the one it is replacing?” The more better, the better. Which is why within a hierarchy of messages (I’m not suggesting that fuel economy should be higher up than green), it’s important to think about the other relative advantages of green innovations.Check out my blog for more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ~Dawn</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2007/11/13/ten-ways-to-convince-a-non-green-that-going-green-saves-money/comment-page-1/#comment-7022</link>
		<dc:creator>~Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2007/11/13/ten-ways-to-convince-a-non-green-that-going-green-saves-money/#comment-7022</guid>
		<description>Right now we buy two 3 gallons jugs of filtered water every 6-8 weeks (longer in the winter) and my roomie drinks that. I drink tap water- so for the time being it is cheaper to not get the faucet filter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right now we buy two 3 gallons jugs of filtered water every 6-8 weeks (longer in the winter) and my roomie drinks that. I drink tap water- so for the time being it is cheaper to not get the faucet filter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
