<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Think Simple Green Is A Good Eco-Friendly Cleaner?  Think Again&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2007/07/30/think-simple-green-is-a-good-eco-friendly-cleaner-think-again/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2007/07/30/think-simple-green-is-a-good-eco-friendly-cleaner-think-again/</link>
	<description>Sustainability, Environment, Progressive Politics, Peak Oil, Going Green.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:40:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Simple Green Logo - MSDS - Ingredients - Side Effects</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2007/07/30/think-simple-green-is-a-good-eco-friendly-cleaner-think-again/#comment-24005</link>
		<dc:creator>Simple Green Logo - MSDS - Ingredients - Side Effects</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2007/07/30/think-simple-green-is-a-good-eco-friendly-cleaner-think-again/#comment-24005</guid>
		<description>[...] Well that would sure make me feel better about using their environmentally friendly non-toxic cleaner. Luckily I don”™t use (nor ever have) their products and I hope they change the formula soon because I am sure a lot of people do use the stuff. A full list of the products with this toxic ingredient can be found at SF Gate, and you might be surprised at the list. Take a look when you get a chance and make sure you are not using any of them in your home. Source [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well that would sure make me feel better about using their environmentally friendly non-toxic cleaner. Luckily I don”™t use (nor ever have) their products and I hope they change the formula soon because I am sure a lot of people do use the stuff. A full list of the products with this toxic ingredient can be found at SF Gate, and you might be surprised at the list. Take a look when you get a chance and make sure you are not using any of them in your home. Source [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2007/07/30/think-simple-green-is-a-good-eco-friendly-cleaner-think-again/#comment-6456</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2007/07/30/think-simple-green-is-a-good-eco-friendly-cleaner-think-again/#comment-6456</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...I need to educate myself.  So I am to believe the studies they provide but not any others? And no matter who discusses EGBE, every study says it is toxic...some just say less so than others. And yes, you can make your own choice of course...I choose to not use it, as do other people here. 

&quot;It”™s my college education, Masters in biology, bachelors in chemistry that makes me respond, and it”™s everday consumers without proper education in biology and chemistry that concerns me the most.&quot; - Sorry but I don&#039;t think we &quot;everyday consumers&quot; need any education in biology to want to avoid any substance that is toxic or potentially toxic...there are plenty of alternatives out there that are not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;I need to educate myself.  So I am to believe the studies they provide but not any others? And no matter who discusses EGBE, every study says it is toxic&#8230;some just say less so than others. And yes, you can make your own choice of course&#8230;I choose to not use it, as do other people here. </p>
<p>&#8220;It”™s my college education, Masters in biology, bachelors in chemistry that makes me respond, and it”™s everday consumers without proper education in biology and chemistry that concerns me the most.&#8221; &#8211; Sorry but I don&#8217;t think we &#8220;everyday consumers&#8221; need any education in biology to want to avoid any substance that is toxic or potentially toxic&#8230;there are plenty of alternatives out there that are not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiara</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2007/07/30/think-simple-green-is-a-good-eco-friendly-cleaner-think-again/#comment-6454</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2007/07/30/think-simple-green-is-a-good-eco-friendly-cleaner-think-again/#comment-6454</guid>
		<description>I have a vested interest in green companies and the truth of what they do as I hate where the world stands today with all the pollution and hazardous situations. It&#039;s my college education, Masters in biology, bachelors in chemistry that makes me respond, and it&#039;s everday consumers without proper education in biology and chemistry that concerns me the most.

I contacted Simple Green as well after that article and they still claim that while they once did animal testing they don&#039;t anymore. But to help point something else out - the field of toxicity testing has changed. Governments around the world have found non-animal testing methods ..even based on calculating toxicity of products based on previously established toxicity of the ingredients. So just because one has the toxicity data on their Safety Sheets doesn&#039;t necessarily just mean they still test on animals. Try asking the company yourself.

Also, everything in dangerous in high enough quantities. Everyone praises vinegar, but vinegar (additional flavor enhancing impurities aside) is just 5% acetic acid in water. have you looked at the hazards of pure acetic acid? Why is a dilute form of one ok, but the not the other for consumers?

I was also outraged by the fact that Simple Green had EGBE in it, but I choose to contact the company and they linked me to a variety of California EPA documents as well as EPA documents - all available on their respective websites, which better explain the hazards of EGBE. Let me just say, it&#039;s not as cut and dry as these articles make it.

The media always hypes up the latest &quot;problem&quot; they encounter. Everyone knows this. Try educating yourself a little instead of just jumping on the band wagon.

After learning more about the true test results of that chemical, I know can make an educated decision whether I should use Simple Green or not. I for one don&#039;t think they are a bad company, but there are greener options out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a vested interest in green companies and the truth of what they do as I hate where the world stands today with all the pollution and hazardous situations. It&#8217;s my college education, Masters in biology, bachelors in chemistry that makes me respond, and it&#8217;s everday consumers without proper education in biology and chemistry that concerns me the most.</p>
<p>I contacted Simple Green as well after that article and they still claim that while they once did animal testing they don&#8217;t anymore. But to help point something else out &#8211; the field of toxicity testing has changed. Governments around the world have found non-animal testing methods ..even based on calculating toxicity of products based on previously established toxicity of the ingredients. So just because one has the toxicity data on their Safety Sheets doesn&#8217;t necessarily just mean they still test on animals. Try asking the company yourself.</p>
<p>Also, everything in dangerous in high enough quantities. Everyone praises vinegar, but vinegar (additional flavor enhancing impurities aside) is just 5% acetic acid in water. have you looked at the hazards of pure acetic acid? Why is a dilute form of one ok, but the not the other for consumers?</p>
<p>I was also outraged by the fact that Simple Green had EGBE in it, but I choose to contact the company and they linked me to a variety of California EPA documents as well as EPA documents &#8211; all available on their respective websites, which better explain the hazards of EGBE. Let me just say, it&#8217;s not as cut and dry as these articles make it.</p>
<p>The media always hypes up the latest &#8220;problem&#8221; they encounter. Everyone knows this. Try educating yourself a little instead of just jumping on the band wagon.</p>
<p>After learning more about the true test results of that chemical, I know can make an educated decision whether I should use Simple Green or not. I for one don&#8217;t think they are a bad company, but there are greener options out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2007/07/30/think-simple-green-is-a-good-eco-friendly-cleaner-think-again/#comment-3102</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 18:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoodhuman.com/2007/07/30/think-simple-green-is-a-good-eco-friendly-cleaner-think-again/#comment-3102</guid>
		<description>I think its pretty obvious that Cory works for Simple Green here, why would a regular consumer defend a company they have no vested interest in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its pretty obvious that Cory works for Simple Green here, why would a regular consumer defend a company they have no vested interest in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
